Xeon W3530 vs E5-2620 v4
Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.5 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.5 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
406f1
Core
Bloomfield
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/16
TDP
130 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2010
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
237.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
8.22k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
12.06k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
4.01k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.89k (x1.06)
TOTAL
18.2k
27.18k (x1.49)
Multithread
W3530
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
61.34k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
90.21k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
26.2k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
4.62k (x1.81)
TOTAL
72.77k
182.37k (x2.51)
Performance/W
W3530
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3530
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4