| | | | | | |

Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806ec
Core
Bloomfield
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
143.23k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
13.6k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
20.03k (x4.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
5.19k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
7.05k (x2.58)
TOTAL
18.2k
45.87k (x2.52)

Multithread

W3530

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
51.42k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
77.48k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
16.65k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
3.69k (x1.44)
TOTAL
72.77k
149.24k (x2.05)

Performance/W
W3530
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
3428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
5165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
1110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3530
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
5135 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1332 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1808 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
11762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4