| | | | | | |

Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-7300HQ


Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 130.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.8 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
906e9
Core
Bloomfield
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
168.81k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
11.71k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
16.74k (x3.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
4.27k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
7.81k (x2.85)
TOTAL
18.2k
40.53k (x2.23)

Multithread

W3530

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
44.38k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
62.55k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
15.6k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
7.85k (x3.07)
TOTAL
72.77k
130.38k (x1.79)

Performance/W
W3530
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
986 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
1390 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
347 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
2897 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3530
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
4783 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
2231 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
11581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4