Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
806e9
Core
Bloomfield
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2010
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
97.52k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
11.39k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
16.47k (x3.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
4.36k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
5.21k (x1.9)
TOTAL
18.2k
37.43k (x2.06)
Multithread
W3530
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
23.57k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
37.4k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
10.15k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
4.78k (x1.87)
TOTAL
72.77k
75.9k (x1.04)
Performance/W
W3530
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
5060 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3530
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4