Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
a0653
Core
Bloomfield
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4 /4
6/12
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2010
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
307.18k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
12.61k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
17.94k (x3.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
4.83k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
10.81k (x3.95)
TOTAL
18.2k
46.19k (x2.54)
Multithread
W3530
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
74.62k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
119.63k (x5.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
32.65k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.52k (x0.99)
TOTAL
72.77k
229.42k (x3.15)
Performance/W
W3530
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
6555 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3530
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4