| | | | | | |

Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.9 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Bloomfield
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
171.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
12.89k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
18.55k (x3.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
9.93k (x3.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
9.54k (x3.49)
TOTAL
18.2k
50.91k (x2.8)

Multithread

W3530

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
50.06k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
66.1k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
20.24k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
5.51k (x2.16)
TOTAL
72.77k
141.91k (x1.95)

Performance/W
W3530
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3530
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4