| | | | | | |

Xeon W3530 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The W3530 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3530 gets a score of 72.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806c1
Core
Bloomfield
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
18.2k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
72.77k points
137.96k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3530
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
12.9k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
4.93k
21.4k (x4.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.02k
10.73k (x3.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
8.16k (x2.98)
TOTAL
18.2k
53.19k (x2.92)

Multithread

W3530

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
31.33k
30.31k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
45.13k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.78k
20.17k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
5.77k (x2.26)
TOTAL
72.77k
101.38k (x1.39)

Performance/W
W3530
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
241 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
178 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
560 points/W
3621 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3530
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2450 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1608 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
892 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
5935 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4