Xeon W3520 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 2 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 2 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
f4a
Core
Nehalem-WS
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
-
Cores/Threads
4 /8
8/8
TDP
130 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
- kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
- kB
Date
March 2009
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
3.87k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
8.17k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
2.67k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
1.82k (x0.65)
TOTAL
17.96k
16.53k (x0.92)
Multithread
W3520
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
3.46k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
22.59k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
8.09k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.85k (x0.45)
TOTAL
73.16k
37k (x0.51)
Performance/W
W3520
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4