Xeon W3520 vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Nehalem-WS
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
142.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
7.07k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
10.55k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
5.27k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
5.66k (x2.01)
TOTAL
17.96k
28.56k (x1.59)
Multithread
W3520
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
25.28k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
37.48k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
17.77k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
6.92k (x1.1)
TOTAL
73.16k
87.45k (x1.2)
Performance/W
W3520
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
5830 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4