Xeon W3520 vs Core i5-1035G1
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.9 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.9 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Nehalem-WS
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
171.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
12.89k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
18.55k (x3.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
9.93k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
9.54k (x3.39)
TOTAL
17.96k
50.91k (x2.83)
Multithread
W3520
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
50.06k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
66.1k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
20.24k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
5.51k (x0.88)
TOTAL
73.16k
141.91k (x1.94)
Performance/W
W3520
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
9461 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4