Xeon W3520 vs Core i3-1005G1
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Nehalem-WS
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2009
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
116.63k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
10.52k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
17.6k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
8.76k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
6.55k (x2.33)
TOTAL
17.96k
43.44k (x2.42)
Multithread
W3520
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
26.86k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
42.38k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
20.65k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
4.21k (x0.67)
TOTAL
73.16k
94.1k (x1.29)
Performance/W
W3520
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
1791 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
2825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1377 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
281 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6273 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3095 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
2577 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1926 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
12775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4