Xeon W3520 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.1 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.1 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906c0
Core
Nehalem-WS
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2009
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
9.83k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
9.74k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
3.65k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
3.88k (x1.38)
TOTAL
17.96k
27.1k (x1.51)
Multithread
W3520
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
25.04k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
24.7k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
9.29k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
5.06k (x0.8)
TOTAL
73.16k
64.09k (x0.88)
Performance/W
W3520
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4