Xeon W3520 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906c0
Core
Nehalem-WS
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2009
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
10.08k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
10.11k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
4.06k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.36k (x0.84)
TOTAL
17.96k
26.6k (x1.48)
Multithread
W3520
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
36.86k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
38.51k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
15.17k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.72k (x0.43)
TOTAL
73.16k
93.26k (x1.27)
Performance/W
W3520
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4