Xeon W3520 vs Celeron N4100
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.8 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.8 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a1
Core
Nehalem-WS
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
March 2009
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
4.72k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
6.99k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
2.69k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.81k (x1)
TOTAL
17.96k
17.21k (x0.96)
Multithread
W3520
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
12.54k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
17.99k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
6.71k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
3.33k (x0.53)
TOTAL
73.16k
40.57k (x0.55)
Performance/W
W3520
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4