Xeon W3520 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 1.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
306a9
Core
Nehalem-WS
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/2
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
7.87k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
7.14k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
3.04k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
2.79k (x0.99)
TOTAL
17.96k
20.84k (x1.16)
Multithread
W3520
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
15.12k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
14.05k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
5.94k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
3.48k (x0.55)
TOTAL
73.16k
38.59k (x0.53)
Performance/W
W3520
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4