| | | | | | |

Xeon W3520 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.3 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
810f81
Core
Nehalem-WS
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2009
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
168.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
14.3k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
21.69k (x4.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
5.42k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
6.6k (x2.34)
TOTAL
17.96k
48k (x2.67)

Multithread

W3520

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
55.45k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
83.13k (x3.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
20.76k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
6.58k (x1.04)
TOTAL
73.16k
165.91k (x2.27)

Performance/W
W3520
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
853 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
2552 points/W

Performance/GHz
W3520
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3574 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
1354 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1650 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
12000 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4