Xeon W3520 vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The W3520 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W3520 gets a score of 73.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.4 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
806c1
Core
Nehalem-WS
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
17.96k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.16k points
137.96k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3520
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.35k
12.9k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
4.89k
21.4k (x4.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.9k
10.73k (x3.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.82k
8.16k (x2.9)
TOTAL
17.96k
53.19k (x2.96)
Multithread
W3520
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.69k
30.31k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.26k
45.13k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.91k
20.17k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
5.77k (x0.92)
TOTAL
73.16k
101.38k (x1.39)
Performance/W
W3520
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
228 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
171 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
3621 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3520
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1669 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
960 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
6123 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4