Xeon L5430 vs Core 2 Duo P8400
Description
Both models L5430 and P8400 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2.5 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2.5 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Harpertown
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.267 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
50 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2008
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
11.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
21.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
2.43k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
5.4k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
2.13k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
1.43k (x0.47)
TOTAL
15.62k
11.38k (x0.73)
Multithread
L5430
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
4.81k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
10.58k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
4.18k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
1.45k (x0.92)
TOTAL
51.64k
21.02k (x0.41)
Performance/W
L5430
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
423 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
841 points/W
Performance/GHz
L5430
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
2383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
629 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
5022 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4