| | | | | | |

Xeon L5430 vs Core i5-7200U


Description
The L5430 is based on Core architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
806e9
Core
Harpertown
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
50 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2008
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
97.52k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
11.39k (x3.68)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
16.47k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
4.36k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
5.21k (x1.73)
TOTAL
15.62k
37.43k (x2.4)

Multithread

L5430

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
23.57k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
37.4k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
10.15k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
4.78k (x3.05)
TOTAL
51.64k
75.9k (x1.47)

Performance/W
L5430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
5060 points/W

Performance/GHz
L5430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4