| | | | | | |

Xeon L5430 vs Core i5-2410M


Description
The L5430 is based on Core architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.

Summarizing, the L5430 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
206a7
Core
Harpertown
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
50 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2008
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
38.68k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
7.98k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
6.55k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
3.28k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
2.7k (x0.9)
TOTAL
15.62k
20.52k (x1.31)

Multithread

L5430

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
13.66k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
13.17k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
7.05k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
3.02k (x1.93)
TOTAL
51.64k
36.9k (x0.71)

Performance/W
L5430
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
390 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
1054 points/W

Performance/GHz
L5430
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
2258 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
7075 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4