| | | | | | |

Xeon L5430 vs Celeron N4100


Description
The L5430 is based on Core architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.

Summarizing, the L5430 is 1.3 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
706a1
Core
Harpertown
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
50 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
September 2008
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
40.57k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
4.72k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
6.99k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
2.69k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
2.81k (x0.93)
TOTAL
15.62k
17.21k (x1.1)

Multithread

L5430

N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
12.54k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
17.99k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
6.71k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
3.33k (x2.12)
TOTAL
51.64k
40.57k (x0.79)

Performance/W
L5430
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
6762 points/W

Performance/GHz
L5430
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4