Xeon L5430 vs Celeron E3300
Description
Both models L5430 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2.1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2.1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Harpertown
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
50 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
1024 kB
Date
September 2008
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
2.9k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
6.38k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
2.59k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
1.08k (x0.36)
TOTAL
15.62k
12.94k (x0.83)
Multithread
L5430
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
5.76k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
12.67k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
5.16k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
1.01k (x0.65)
TOTAL
51.64k
24.6k (x0.48)
Performance/W
L5430
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
L5430
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4