Xeon L5430 vs A6 9210
Description
The L5430 is based on Core architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the L5430 gets a score of 51.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
670f00
Core
Harpertown
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket 771
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
50 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
1024 kB
Date
September 2008
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
15.62k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.64k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
L5430
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3.09k
4.87k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
6.86k
10.38k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.66k
2.59k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
2.38k (x0.79)
TOTAL
15.62k
20.22k (x1.29)
Multithread
L5430
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
7.41k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
27.27k
11.87k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.41k
3.35k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.57k
2.6k (x1.66)
TOTAL
51.64k
25.23k (x0.49)
Performance/W
L5430
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
248 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
545 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1033 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
L5430
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2573 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
996 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1128 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5858 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4