Xeon E5645 vs W3530
Description
Both models E5645 and W3530 are based on Westmere architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 1.1 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 1.1 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
106a5
Core
Westmere-EP
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4 /4
TDP
80 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2010
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5645
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
6.47k
7.51k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
4.4k
4.93k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.43k
3.02k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
2.74k (x1.17)
TOTAL
15.64k
18.2k (x1.16)
Multithread
E5645
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
34.43k
31.33k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
24.23k
23.11k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
15.78k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
2.55k (x0.67)
TOTAL
76.96k
72.77k (x0.95)
Performance/W
E5645
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
430 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
303 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5645
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2311 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1573 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
867 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
833 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
5584 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4