Xeon E5645 vs Core i3-6100T
Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 50.7 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 50.7 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
506e3
Core
Westmere-EP
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6 /6
2/4
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2010
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
105.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5645
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
3.14k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
3.91k
12.26k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.52k
3.94k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
2.21k (x0.91)
TOTAL
10.64k
21.55k (x2.03)
Multithread
E5645
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.67k
6.52k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
30.61k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.31k
10.59k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
2.77k (x0.73)
TOTAL
50.7k
50.49k (x1)
Performance/W
E5645
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
121 points/W
186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
286 points/W
875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
179 points/W
302 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
634 points/W
1442 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5645
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
635 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/GHz
3832 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
901 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
865 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
TOTAL
3798 points/GHz
6733 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4