Xeon E5645 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
906c0
Core
Westmere-EP
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/4
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2010
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5645
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
6.47k
10.08k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
4.4k
10.11k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.43k
4.06k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
2.36k (x1.01)
TOTAL
15.64k
26.6k (x1.7)
Multithread
E5645
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
34.43k
36.86k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.23k
38.51k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
15.17k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
2.72k (x0.71)
TOTAL
76.96k
93.26k (x1.21)
Performance/W
E5645
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
430 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
303 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5645
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2311 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1573 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
867 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
833 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
5584 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4