Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 50.7 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 2.5 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 50.7 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 2.5 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
800f11
Core
Westmere-EP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
AM4
Cores/Threads
6 /6
6/12
TDP
80 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2010
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
173.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5645
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
3.95k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3.91k
18.36k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.52k
5.39k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
17.35k (x7.16)
TOTAL
10.64k
45.06k (x4.24)
Multithread
E5645
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.67k
19.47k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
77.19k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.31k
15.4k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
12.25k (x3.22)
TOTAL
50.7k
124.3k (x2.45)
Performance/W
E5645
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
121 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
286 points/W
813 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
179 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
634 points/W
1308 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5645
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
635 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1397 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
901 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
865 points/GHz
4338 points/GHz
TOTAL
3798 points/GHz
11265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4