Xeon E5645 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The E5645 is based on Westmere architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 4.7 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5645 gets a score of 77 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 4.7 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
300f10
Core
Westmere-EP
Llano
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
6 /6
2/2
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
kB
Date
March 2010
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5645
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
6.47k
3.98k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
4.4k
4k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.43k
2.05k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.33k
1.37k (x0.59)
TOTAL
15.64k
11.4k (x0.73)
Multithread
E5645
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
34.43k
5.74k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
24.23k
6.05k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.48k
2.85k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
1.86k (x0.49)
TOTAL
76.96k
16.5k (x0.21)
Performance/W
E5645
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
430 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
303 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5645
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2311 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1573 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
867 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
833 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5584 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4