Xeon E5506 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.4 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the E5506 is 2.4 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
f4a
Core
Gainestown
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
-
Cores/Threads
4 /4
8/8
TDP
80 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
- kB
Cache L2
256 kB
- kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
- kB
Date
March 2009
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.48k
3.87k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
2.99k
8.17k (x2.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.81k
2.67k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
1.82k (x2.62)
TOTAL
9.97k
16.53k (x1.66)
Multithread
E5506
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
41k
3.46k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
22.59k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.4k
8.09k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
2.85k (x0.74)
TOTAL
90.45k
37k (x0.41)
Performance/W
E5506
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5506
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4