| | | | | | |

Xeon E5506 vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.3 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
a0652
Core
Gainestown
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4 /4
6/12
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2009
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
4.69k (x3.89)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
18.71k (x6.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
5.84k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
13.95k (x17.87)
TOTAL
6.68k
43.19k (x6.46)

Multithread

E5506

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
18.79k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
86.1k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
27.42k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
5.27k (x1.05)
TOTAL
59.9k
137.58k (x2.3)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.48k
16.63k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
2.99k
24.17k (x8.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.81k
6.38k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
13.69k (x19.77)
TOTAL
9.97k
60.87k (x6.1)

Multithread

E5506

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
41k
67.07k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
28.17k
107.95k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.4k
27.05k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
5.07k (x1.31)
TOTAL
90.45k
207.14k (x2.29)

Performance/W
E5506
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
1490 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
601 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
4603 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5506
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
3325 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
4834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
2738 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
12174 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4