| | | | | | |

Xeon E5506 vs Core i5-9300H


Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 59.9 k points while the i5-9300H gets 80.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.3 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
906ea
Core
Gainestown
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2009
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
9.97k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
90.45k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.21k
3.38k (x2.8)
Test#2 (FP)
2.75k
12.84k (x4.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
4.6k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.78k
6.23k (x7.98)
TOTAL
6.68k
27.05k (x4.05)

Multithread

E5506

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
11.6k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
25.55k
48.01k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.1k
17.05k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.01k
3.88k (x0.78)
TOTAL
59.9k
80.54k (x1.34)

Performance/W
E5506
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
153 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
319 points/W
1067 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214 points/W
379 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
63 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
749 points/W
1790 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5506
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
565 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1291 points/GHz
3132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
910 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
366 points/GHz
1519 points/GHz
TOTAL
3132 points/GHz
6597 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4