| | | |

Xeon E5506 vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The E5506 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5506 gets a score of 90.4 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.6 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Gainestown
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
August 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5506
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1206
3876 (221.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
2754
14979 (443.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1941
9699 (399.83%)
Test#1 (Memory)
781
8599 (1,001.75%)
TOTAL
6681
37153 (456.12%)

Multithread

E5506

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
12246
14612 (19.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
25545
54898 (114.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17097
27578 (61.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5008
5044 (0.74%)
TOTAL
59896
102132 (70.52%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5506
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4477
12888 (187.85%)
Test#2 (FP)
2994
18551 (519.63%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1808
9934 (449.57%)
Test#1 (Memory)
692
9539 (1,277.43%)
TOTAL
9971
50912 (410.58%)

Multithread

E5506

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
41004
50059 (22.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
28167
66100 (134.67%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17399
20239 (16.32%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3879
5514 (42.18%)
TOTAL
90449
141913 (56.90%)

Performance/W
E5506
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
352 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
48 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
1131 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5506
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2099 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1404 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
847 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
4675 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8