| | | | | | |

Xeon E5504 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)


Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.

Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.9 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
10676
Core
Gainestown
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
22.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
2.88k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
6.31k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
2.53k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
1.35k (x0.95)
TOTAL
10.92k
13.08k (x1.2)

Multithread

E5504

E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
5.45k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
11.5k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
4.02k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
1.05k (x0.44)
TOTAL
41.95k
22.02k (x0.52)

Performance/W
E5504
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
339 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5504
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4