Xeon E5504 vs Core i5-7500
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the i5-7500 gets 154.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.7 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the i5-7500 gets 154.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.7 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
906e9
Core
Gainestown
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
191.71k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
14.09k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
19.8k (x6.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
5.34k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
8.45k (x5.92)
TOTAL
10.92k
47.67k (x4.37)
Multithread
E5504
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
53.99k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
77.43k (x6.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
20.81k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.53k (x1.06)
TOTAL
41.95k
154.77k (x3.69)
Performance/W
E5504
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
2381 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
5210 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
2222 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
12546 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4