Xeon E5504 vs Celeron N3150
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.3 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.3 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
406c3
Core
Gainestown
Braswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
80 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
March 2009
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
31.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
3.91k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
2.29k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
1.57k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
1.44k (x1.01)
TOTAL
10.92k
9.21k (x0.84)
Multithread
E5504
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
14.78k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
8.62k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
5.84k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.57k (x1.07)
TOTAL
41.95k
31.8k (x0.76)
Performance/W
E5504
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4