Xeon E5504 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.2 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.2 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
506e3
Core
Gainestown
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
8.56k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
12.25k (x3.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
3.17k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
3.35k (x2.35)
TOTAL
10.92k
27.33k (x2.5)
Multithread
E5504
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
16.42k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
23.61k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
5.75k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
3.55k (x1.48)
TOTAL
41.95k
49.34k (x1.18)
Performance/W
E5504
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4