Xeon E5504 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
306a9
Core
Gainestown
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
7.87k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
7.14k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
3.04k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
2.79k (x1.95)
TOTAL
10.92k
20.84k (x1.91)
Multithread
E5504
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
15.12k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
14.05k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
5.94k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
3.48k (x1.46)
TOTAL
41.95k
38.59k (x0.92)
Performance/W
E5504
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4