Xeon E5504 vs Celeron E3300
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.7 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.7 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
1067a
Core
Gainestown
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
24.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
2.9k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
6.38k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
2.59k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
1.08k (x0.76)
TOTAL
10.92k
12.94k (x1.18)
Multithread
E5504
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
5.76k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
12.67k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
5.16k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
1.01k (x0.42)
TOTAL
41.95k
24.6k (x0.59)
Performance/W
E5504
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4