Xeon E5504 vs Celeron 3855U
Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.7 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.7 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
406e3
Core
Gainestown
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/2
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2096 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
24.56k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
5.93k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
8.53k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
2.28k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
2.5k (x1.75)
TOTAL
10.92k
19.24k (x1.76)
Multithread
E5504
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
7.87k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
11.28k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
2.91k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
2.5k (x1.04)
TOTAL
41.95k
24.56k (x0.59)
Performance/W
E5504
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
524 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
752 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
1637 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5504
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
3706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
5333 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
1562 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
12024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4