| | | | | | |

Xeon E5504 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The E5504 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5504 gets a score of 42 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.5 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
810f10
Core
Gainestown
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2/4
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2009
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
10.92k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.95k points
71.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5504
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
11.67k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
3.07k
14.02k (x4.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.85k
4.53k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
2.93k (x2.05)
TOTAL
10.92k
33.14k (x3.04)

Multithread

E5504

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.07k
20.49k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
12.52k
31.32k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
9.99k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.39k
3.03k (x1.27)
TOTAL
41.95k
64.82k (x1.55)

Performance/W
E5504
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
238 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
157 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
30 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
524 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5504
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2287 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1535 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
713 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
5460 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4