Xeon E5502 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E2200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.4 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the E2200 gets 15.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.4 times faster than the E2200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
6fd
Core
Gainestown
Allendale
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2007
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
8.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
15.44k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
2.53k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
2.3k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.31k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.16k (x0.8)
TOTAL
11.3k
8.29k (x0.73)
Multithread
E5502
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
5.06k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
4.58k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
4.61k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
1.18k (x0.45)
TOTAL
22.28k
15.44k (x0.69)
Performance/W
E5502
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
237 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
E2200
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
1048 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
529 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4