Xeon E5502 vs Pentium 4 HT 630
Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 630 is based on NetBurst.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the 630 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 2.5 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the 630 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 2.5 times faster than the 630. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
f43
Core
Gainestown
Prescott
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
1/2
TDP
80 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
2005
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
7.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
9.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
630
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
2.1k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
3.33k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1.58k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
0.91k (x0.63)
TOTAL
11.3k
7.92k (x0.7)
Multithread
E5502
630
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
1.85k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
4.47k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
1.92k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
0.9k (x0.34)
TOTAL
22.28k
9.14k (x0.41)
Performance/W
E5502
630
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
22 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
53 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
23 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
109 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
630
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
699 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
305 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
2640 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4