Xeon E5502 vs Core 2 Duo E6320
Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the E6320 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.7 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.7 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
6f6
Core
Gainestown
Conroe
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
1.86 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
8.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
13.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
2.16k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
1.94k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1.94k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.2k (x1.51)
TOTAL
11.3k
8.24k (x0.73)
Multithread
E5502
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
4.28k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
3.82k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.84k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
1.25k (x0.47)
TOTAL
22.28k
13.19k (x0.59)
Performance/W
E5502
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
59 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
59 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
203 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
1045 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
4431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4