Xeon E5502 vs Core i7-720QM
Description
Both models E5502 and i7-720QM are based on Nehalem architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.7 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.7 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
106e5
Core
Gainestown
Clarksfield
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.867 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
38.78k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
5.49k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
3.55k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.01k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.09k (x1.43)
TOTAL
11.3k
13.13k (x1.16)
Multithread
E5502
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
15.06k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
12.15k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
7.18k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
4.39k (x1.66)
TOTAL
22.28k
38.78k (x1.74)
Performance/W
E5502
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
270 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
160 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
862 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
1962 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
717 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
745 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4