| | | | | | |

Xeon E5502 vs Core i5-8500T


Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the i5-8500T gets 203.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 9.1 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
906ea
Core
Gainestown
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.867 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/6
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
March 2009
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
251.82k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
12.93k (x2.72)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
18.61k (x5.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
4.76k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
10.05k (x6.92)
TOTAL
11.3k
46.36k (x4.1)

Multithread

E5502

i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
71.15k (x7.51)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
102.74k (x16.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
26.6k (x6.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
2.9k (x1.1)
TOTAL
22.28k
203.39k (x9.13)

Performance/W
E5502
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
2033 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
760 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
83 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
5811 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5502
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
3695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
5318 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
1360 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
13245 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4