Xeon E5502 vs Celeron J4105
Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.8 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.8 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a1
Core
Gainestown
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.867 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
80 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2009
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
61.49k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
4.9k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
7.26k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.75k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
3.32k (x2.28)
TOTAL
11.3k
18.22k (x1.61)
Multithread
E5502
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
18.84k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
27.45k (x4.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
10.35k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
4.85k (x1.84)
TOTAL
22.28k
61.49k (x2.76)
Performance/W
E5502
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4