| | | | | | |

Xeon E5502 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.6 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
100fa0
Core
Gainestown
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.867 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/6
TDP
80 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
80.19k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
5.17k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
5.33k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
2.76k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
3.51k (x2.42)
TOTAL
11.3k
16.77k (x1.48)

Multithread

E5502

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
29.82k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
30.79k (x4.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
15.88k (x4.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
3.69k (x1.4)
TOTAL
22.28k
80.19k (x3.6)

Performance/W
E5502
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5502
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4