Xeon E5502 vs Athlon II M300
Description
The E5502 is based on Nehalem architecture while the M300 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.3 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5502 gets a score of 22.3 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.3 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
100f62
Core
Gainestown
Caspian
Base frecuency
1.867 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/2
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
March 2009
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
11.3k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.28k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5502
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.76k
2.66k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
3.15k
3.84k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.94k
1.97k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.1k (x0.76)
TOTAL
11.3k
9.57k (x0.85)
Multithread
E5502
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
9.48k
5.04k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
6.3k
7.46k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.75k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
1.48k (x0.56)
TOTAL
22.28k
17.73k (x0.8)
Performance/W
E5502
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
118 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
79 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
278 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5502
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1685 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1038 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
779 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
6051 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4