Xeon E5472 vs E5502
Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.2 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.2 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
106a5
Core
Harpertown
Gainestown
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
80 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2007
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
4.76k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
3.15k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
1.94k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
1.45k (x0.3)
TOTAL
16.62k
11.3k (x0.68)
Multithread
E5472
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
9.48k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
6.3k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
3.86k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.64k (x1.04)
TOTAL
48.62k
22.28k (x0.46)
Performance/W
E5472
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5472
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4