Xeon E5472 vs Core i3-6100T
Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 44.4 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.1 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 44.4 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.1 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
506e3
Core
Harpertown
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2007
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
105.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
3.14k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
12.26k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
3.94k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
2.21k (x0.46)
TOTAL
15.39k
21.55k (x1.4)
Multithread
E5472
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
6.52k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
30.61k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
10.59k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.77k (x1.1)
TOTAL
44.38k
50.49k (x1.14)
Performance/W
E5472
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
113 points/W
186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
289 points/W
875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
302 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
555 points/W
1442 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5472
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
763 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1950 points/GHz
3832 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
814 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1603 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
TOTAL
5129 points/GHz
6733 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4